Metropolis Reality Forums - Review: '80 Days' falls very short

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
May 11^th, 2025, 12:23am

Home

Metropolis Reality Forums « Review: '80 Days' falls very short »

Hot Movie News and Reviews at Entertainment Spectrum!
www.EntertainmentSpectrum.com

   Metropolis Reality Forums
   Off-Topic Forums
   Movie Discussion (Moderators: Heather, yesteach, Isle_be_back)
   Review: '80 Days' falls very short

Previous topic | New Topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic

Author

Topic: Review: '80 Days' falls very short (Read 221 times)

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Review: '80 Days' falls very short
« on: Jun 19^th, 2004, 1:29am »

Quote

Modify

Review: '80 Days' falls very short
Movie shows little subtlety, has few laughs
By Christy Lemire
Associated Press
Wednesday, June 16, 2004 Posted: 10:03 AM EDT (1403 GMT)

(AP) -- "Speed is good, only when wisdom leads the way," Edward R. Murrow warns during the prologue to the original "Around the World in 80 Days."

The people responsible for remaking the movie apparently didn't heed his advice.

While the journey was the destination in the 1956 Michael Todd production (which won five Oscars, including best picture), this slick new version can't seem to get back to London fast enough.

While the original was big and beautiful, with tens of thousands of extras (68,894 to be exact, according to the video box), it had some neat small moments, too. Floating in a hot air balloon across the Alps with David Niven, Cantinflas grabs armfuls of snow from a mountaintop and stuffs it in a bucket to chill a bottle of champagne. The entire sequence occurs wordlessly, a foreign concept in the remake, which overwhelms with wall-to-wall dialogue, music and sound effects.

Calling this a remake isn't entirely accurate, since it only vaguely resembles the source material and the 1873 Jules Verne novel that inspired it.

It still features a London gentleman named Phileas Fogg, who agrees to circumnavigate the globe on a bet. (Comedian Steve Coogan fills in for Niven, and replaces his prim, controlled demeanor with wide-eyed mania and non-stop chatter.)

And as in the first film, celebrities galore populate the picture in cameos, though not even close to the same caliber. While the 1956 movie featured glimpses of Frank Sinatra, Buster Keaton, John Gielgud and Marlene Dietrich, the stars this time include Macy Gray, Rob Schneider and Richard Branson.

Arnold Schwarzenegger is good for a couple of laughs, though, as Turkish Prince Hapi. Wearing a curly black wig that makes him look like Gene Simmons on steroids, the California governor jokes while sitting in the hot tub, "I'm such a fool, always embarrassing myself in front of visiting dignitaries." Real-life brothers Luke and Owen Wilson make the most amusing appearance of all as Orville and Wilbur Wright.

The Passepartout story

But this is really a Jackie Chan movie, as evidenced by his name above the title and his prominent listing as stunt choreographer. Chan plays the Cantinflas role of Passepartout, Fogg's faux French valet who gets dragged along for the journey. He's also a thief with a heart of gold, having stolen a jade Buddha from the Bank of England, and he's using Fogg to help him return the object to its rightful spot in his Chinese village.

The fight sequences (and there are a lot of them) display all of Chan's trademark energy and inventiveness -- the best features Passepartout back home, battling a skilled enemy while using a small wooden bench as a shield, a weapon and a dance partner all at once.

Somewhere amid all this madness, director Frank Coraci -- working from a script by three guys named David (Titcher, Benullo and Goldstein) -- wedges in a romance between Fogg and aspiring painter Monique (Cecile de France).

Coraci is a longtime friend of Adam Sandler's, and directed the Sandler films "The Waterboy" and "The Wedding Singer," which should tell you a little something about his interest in subtlety.

Coogan, when he's alone and during the film's quieter moments, shows glimmers of the humor that made him a star in Britain with his Alan Partridge character on radio and television.

Those opportunities are rare, though. This is a film that's more interested in keeping kids entertained with animated sequences and sped-up footage, gadgets and bright colors.

In that sense, this "Around the World in 80 Days" is even more family friendly than its predecessor. But that certainly doesn't make it better.

"Around the World in 80 Days," a Walt Disney release, is rated PG for action violence, some crude humor and mild language.

IP Logged

JP
Moderator
ForumsNet Member

Ditch IE. Use Firefox.

Gender:

Posts: 14706

Re: Review: '80 Days' falls very short
« Reply #1 on: Jun 19^th, 2004, 12:06pm »

Quote

Modify

Hmmm, I'm still thinking if I'm going to watch it. I like Jackie Chan, but there's something weird in this movie (as I have seen in the trailer). I can't put my finger on it.

IP Logged

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: Review: '80 Days' falls very short
« Reply #2 on: Jun 19^th, 2004, 8:22pm »

Quote

Modify

I heard on the radio last night that this one has been on the shelf a long time before release because it was initially so bad. That doesn't bode well for it...

IP Logged

JP
Moderator
ForumsNet Member

Ditch IE. Use Firefox.

Gender:

Posts: 14706

Re: Review: '80 Days' falls very short
« Reply #3 on: Jun 21^st, 2004, 2:44pm »

Quote

Modify

I feel bad to what they have done (if the reviews are true) to this movie/story. I feel that his story should have been made better, since it's a taken from a timeless story. Sad

IP Logged

JP
Moderator
ForumsNet Member

Ditch IE. Use Firefox.

Gender:

Posts: 14706

Re: Review: '80 Days' falls very short
« Reply #4 on: Jun 21^st, 2004, 4:53pm »

Quote

Modify

Just got this from http://www.the-movie-times.com

June 18-20
1. Dodgeball $30.0 M
2. The Terminal $18.7 M
3. Harry Potter 3 $17.4 M
4. Shrek 2 $13.6 M
5. Garfield $11.0 M
6. The Stepford Wives $9.2 M
7. The Chronicles of Riddick $8.3 M
8. The Day After Tomorrow $7.6 M
9. Around the World in 80 Days $6.8 M
10. Troy $1.7 M

Does this mean Around the World... is a flop?!

IP Logged

PuffPuffPass
ForumsNet Member

Terry Fox: A True Canadian Hero

Gender:

Posts: 916

Re: Review: '80 Days' falls very short
« Reply #5 on: Jun 21^st, 2004, 5:17pm »

Quote

Modify

NO, It means that there were $11.0 M spent on the worst movie idea ever.

I mean cmon people, isnt it a little late to be bringing out a Garfield movie? when was the last time anyone bought a Garfeld book or stuffed animal or window sticker? If we are gonna start making movies about pop icons over 15 years old then I now put my vote in for ALF THE MOVIE

IP Logged

Here's to cheating, stealing, fighting, and drinking.
If you cheat, may you cheat death.
If you steal, may you steal a woman's heart.
If you fight,

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic


Previous topic \| New Topic \| Next topic »