Metropolis Reality Forums - EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished

Welcome, Guest. Please Login or Register.
Dec 31^st, 2025, 10:27am

Home

Metropolis Reality Forums « EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished »

Hot Movie News and Reviews at Entertainment Spectrum!
www.EntertainmentSpectrum.com

   Metropolis Reality Forums
   Off-Topic Forums
   Movie Discussion (Moderators: Heather, yesteach, Isle_be_back)
   EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished

Previous topic | New Topic | Next topic »

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic

Author

Topic: EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished (Read 434 times)

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished
« on: May 7^th, 2006, 1:49pm »

Quote

Modify

EW review: Cruise's 'Mission': Accomplished
Cruise is fine, Hoffman great, film clever
By Owen Gleiberman
Entertainment Weekly

Thursday, May 4, 2006; Posted: 2:50 p.m. EDT (18:50 GMT)

(Entertainment Weekly) -- The summer movie season always has an official beginning, even if it gets nudged back a little earlier each year (by 2016, we'll probably be watching "The Mighty Thor IV" on President's Day). What it no longer has is any real end.

The blossom-of-gasoline explosions, the crushed metal, the zippy seamless mutability of a world gone CGI, the heroes who, if not Superman, are always super men -- what it all adds up to is Hollywood's endless summer, the ride that never stops.

And yet, once again, it begins.

In "Mission: Impossible III," Tom Cruise, as the no-fear, no-sweat IMF agent Ethan Hunt, scurries across a freeway bridge that's been blasted to smithereens and, using nothing but a machine gun, faces down a rogue fighter jet as it launches missiles right at him.

He swings from one skyscraper to the next, skittering off the face of a glass pyramid and shooting a guard in mid-slide, landing at the roof's edge with a perfectly understated and in-control ''OK!''

He sprints through the streets of Shanghai in a black T-shirt that makes him look like the fittest movie star ever and, more arrestingly, strolls quietly into empty rooms, gathering the film's tension around the wary, coiled urgency of his stare.

But wait. It's impossible to watch "M:I-3" without asking: Do we still, you know, like Tom Cruise?

Last year, the actor's tone-deaf offscreen antics appeared to break up his 20-year love affair with the media, and maybe the public, too. Yet his Great Gossip World Stumble wasn't really a violation of his star quality; it was that very quality taken to extremes.

His big mistake on "Oprah," for example, was using his springy energy and cocksure grin, his ''spontaneous'' jock-in-front-of-the-bedroom-mirror gestures, his whole spirit of jet-propelled certainty to proclaim romantic devotion -- a feeling that by nature is quiet and reflective. Forgetting the lesson of "Jerry Maguire" (''You complete me''), Cruise acted like a guy who completes himself. It's not that he gave a bad performance but that he gave the wrong performance at the wrong time.

"M:I-3," a gratifyingly clever, booby-trapped thriller that has enough fun and imagination and dash to more than justify its existence, seems purposely designed to counteract that gaffe. This time, Agent Hunt is a bit of a softie -- or, at least, a guy driven by devotion to the woman in his life.

The film opens, rather startlingly, with our hero handcuffed to a chair, as the villain, played with casual slovenly menace by Philip Seymour Hoffman, points a gun at Hunt's bound-and-gagged wife (Michelle Monaghan) and promises to blow her brains out unless Hunt coughs up the Rabbit's Foot, the MacGuffin of a secret weapon that everyone is after.

That creepy flash-forward sets the film's stakes -- this time, in other words, it's personal -- and Cruise, shaking off the karma of his "Oprah" victory dance, plays Hunt with a keen and watchful intensity, as a knight of espionage doing what he does for love.

I'm happy to report that he also still likes to put on a rubber face. After an overly long exposition in which Hunt tries to rescue a kidnapped agent (Keri Russell) with a time-released micro-bomb implanted in her head, the real amusement begins, as Hunt and his team infiltrate Vatican City, where they're out to capture Owen Davian (Hoffman), an arms dealer who, for the right price, will sell any toxic weapon to any jihad.

Ving Rhames' Luther is back, trading barbs about marriage with Hunt, and this time the crew includes surly Jonathan Rhys Meyers and slinky Maggie Q, who has a high-maintenance hauteur. Billy Crudup, as the point man back at headquarters, comes off like Cruise's pasty-faced academic doppelganger.

The director, J.J. Abrams, is the co-creator and executive producer of "Lost" and "Alias," with their ropy narrative games, and for a good stretch he does a craftier job than Brian De Palma or John Woo did in the first two "Mission: Impossibles" of reviving the cornball clockwork pleasures of an ingenious trip-wire deception. As Hunt, on a computerized pulley, enters the Vatican, then poses as a priest, then puts on a latex mask to impersonate Davian, only to be forced at the last moment to fake a restroom coughing fit before his Davian voice is electronically activated, "M:I-3" stoked my fondest memories of the original TV show's daisy-chain-of-technology suspense.

There's nothing old-fashioned, however, about Philip Seymour Hoffman's performance. Most great actors, when handed the role of a blockbuster villain, will ham it up with style, but Hoffman makes Davian a grubby banal monster. When he warns Hunt that he'll find his wife or girlfriend and hurt her, really hurt her, he shakes his head in mock shame, as if making a sorrowful confession at his weekly meeting of Sadists Anonymous.

I wish the second half of "M:I-3" were as playfully tricky as the first half; the movie builds to some standard, if breathlessly timed, rescue heroics. Yet its central duel lingers: Hoffman the sullen misanthrope, itching to kill, and Cruise the agent-protector, saving the one he loves with aerobic earnestness.

EW Grade: B+

IP Logged

Rhune
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 292

Re: EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished
« Reply #1 on: May 7^th, 2006, 1:51pm »

Quote

Modify

All right, I admit it. I watched this film. LOL

I am a big non-fan of Tom Cruise, but after reading a review where the first thing they pointed out was that this is more of a J.J. Abrams (creator of Lost) film than a Tom Cruise film, I talked myself into going.

I loved it! Parts were predictable, parts were excitingly not, it was just very enjoyable and worth my $8.

IP Logged

yesteach
ForumsNet Administrator

Gender:

Posts: 10465

Re: EW review: 'Mission': Accomplished
« Reply #2 on: May 17^th, 2006, 1:28am »

Quote

Modify

We went this weekend... and while I agree, not fond of Cruise.. I thought Phillip Seymour Hoffman was awesome!! He took a small role and made it into a fascinating character... the man is very talented.. he definitely deserved the Oscar this year!

IP Logged

There are only 10 types of people in the world... those who understand binary, and those who don't.

Pages: 1

Add Poll

Notify of replies

Send Topic


Previous topic \| New Topic \| Next topic »